Burmese vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,349,024 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $93,971, a difference of 9.8%), householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $65,326, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $111,602, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $52,540, a difference of 4.3%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $42,542, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 21.8%), receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.40%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.5%), married-couple households (49.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.57%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.92%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 35.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.6%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and bachelor's degree (46.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.95%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.2%).