Burmese vs Arab Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 430,748,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Arabs within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Arabs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Arabs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $97,336, a difference of 16.8%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $88,398, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $104,566, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $51,219, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $40,718, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 31.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.0%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.92%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.8%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.15%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.5%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 6.2%).