Burmese vs Colville Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Colville
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Colville

Exceptional
Poor
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,752
SOCIAL INDEX
15.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
289th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Colville Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,294,180 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Colville within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.476. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Colville. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 12.5 Colville.
Burmese Integration in Colville Communities

Burmese vs Colville Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $82,474, a difference of 47.2%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $70,094, a difference of 47.1%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $85,792, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $49,774, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $37,514, a difference of 19.7%), and median earnings ($54,559 compared to $42,151, a difference of 29.4%).
Burmese vs Colville Income
Income MetricBurmeseColville
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$38,047
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Tragic
$85,792
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Tragic
$70,094
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$42,151
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Tragic
$48,516
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$37,514
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Tragic
$49,774
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Tragic
$82,604
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Tragic
$82,474
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Tragic
$51,739
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
21.3%

Burmese vs Colville Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 111.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 94.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 85.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 30.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 34.0%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 38.1%).
Burmese vs Colville Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseColville
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
16.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
29.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
25.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
23.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
24.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
22.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
29.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
21.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
39.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
18.3%

Burmese vs Colville Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 75.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 74.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 74.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.8%).
Burmese vs Colville Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseColville
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.4%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
29.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
11.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.4%

Burmese vs Colville Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
Burmese vs Colville Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseColville
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
59.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
81.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
79.5%

Burmese vs Colville Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 71.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 62.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.5%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 8.6%).
Burmese vs Colville Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseColville
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Tragic
41.0%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
43.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
45.3%

Burmese vs Colville Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 63.3%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 41.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 24.8%).
Burmese vs Colville Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseColville
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
13.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
86.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
25.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
11.1%

Burmese vs Colville Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 69.2%), bachelor's degree (46.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 61.6%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.060%), 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
Burmese vs Colville Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseColville
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Tragic
83.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
62.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
54.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
29.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.6%

Burmese vs Colville Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 192.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 91.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 72.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.9%).
Burmese vs Colville Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseColville
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
16.5%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
15.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
30.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
55.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%