Burmese vs Cajun Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cajun
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Cajuns

Exceptional
Poor
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,029
SOCIAL INDEX
17.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
275th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cajun Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,896,818 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Cajuns.
Burmese Integration in Cajun Communities

Burmese vs Cajun Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $83,015, a difference of 46.3%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $70,605, a difference of 46.1%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $87,157, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $45,338, a difference of 20.9%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 20.9%), and median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $52,325, a difference of 24.7%).
Burmese vs Cajun Income
Income MetricBurmeseCajun
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$37,527
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Tragic
$87,157
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Tragic
$70,605
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$42,189
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Poor
$52,325
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$34,034
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Tragic
$45,338
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Tragic
$82,393
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Tragic
$83,015
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Tragic
$51,397
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
33.9%

Burmese vs Cajun Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 82.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 78.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 17.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.0%).
Burmese vs Cajun Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseCajun
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
25.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
19.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
24.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
22.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
19.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
30.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
40.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
13.7%

Burmese vs Cajun Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 52.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.2%).
Burmese vs Cajun Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseCajun
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%

Burmese vs Cajun Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Burmese vs Cajun Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseCajun
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
61.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
37.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
82.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
78.1%

Burmese vs Cajun Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 55.4%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 38.7%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.7%).
Burmese vs Cajun Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseCajun
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Excellent
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Average
46.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
41.0%

Burmese vs Cajun Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 0.25%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.1%).
Burmese vs Cajun Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseCajun
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
57.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
6.0%

Burmese vs Cajun Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 82.2%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 81.7%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 79.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Burmese vs Cajun Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseCajun
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
91.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
89.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
87.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Tragic
82.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
57.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
51.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
37.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
29.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Burmese vs Cajun Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 66.5%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 65.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.2%).
Burmese vs Cajun Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseCajun
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
15.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
27.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
50.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%