Burmese vs Ottawa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ottawa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Ottawa

Exceptional
Fair
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,097
SOCIAL INDEX
28.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
233rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ottawa Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,622,192 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.127. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Ottawa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 9.0 Ottawa.
Burmese Integration in Ottawa Communities

Burmese vs Ottawa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $70,984, a difference of 45.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $83,953, a difference of 44.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $79,012, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $47,366, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $53,217, a difference of 33.7%).
Burmese vs Ottawa Income
Income MetricBurmeseOttawa
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$37,101
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Tragic
$86,380
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Tragic
$70,984
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$39,721
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Tragic
$46,611
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$33,378
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Tragic
$47,366
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Tragic
$79,012
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Tragic
$83,953
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Tragic
$53,217
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
27.0%

Burmese vs Ottawa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 53.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 53.0%), and receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.6%).
Burmese vs Ottawa Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseOttawa
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
10.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
22.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
17.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
20.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
19.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
19.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
19.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
26.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
35.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
13.1%

Burmese vs Ottawa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 52.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Burmese vs Ottawa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseOttawa
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%

Burmese vs Ottawa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 24.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Burmese vs Ottawa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseOttawa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
62.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
76.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
43.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
76.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
79.5%

Burmese vs Ottawa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 38.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.9%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.5%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.2%).
Burmese vs Ottawa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseOttawa
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Poor
45.8%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
36.5%

Burmese vs Ottawa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.12%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Burmese vs Ottawa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseOttawa
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
92.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Burmese vs Ottawa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 79.1%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 66.5%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Burmese vs Ottawa Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseOttawa
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
91.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
90.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Average
85.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
54.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
40.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
31.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
11.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.6%

Burmese vs Ottawa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 58.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 52.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.9%).
Burmese vs Ottawa Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseOttawa
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
8.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
25.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Fair
47.6%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%