Burmese vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 369,148,536 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 36.4 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($123,369 compared to $88,295, a difference of 39.7%), median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $46,736, a difference of 39.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $87,705, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $51,525, a difference of 6.4%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 23.8%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $35,695, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 66.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 65.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.1%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.8%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 44.9%), and births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.81%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.40, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 86.7%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 77.5%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.5%).