Burmese vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Burmese
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Burmese
Tsimshian
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Burmese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,452,978 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Tsimshian.
Burmese vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $48,836, a difference of 33.6%), per capita income ($52,005 compared to $40,344, a difference of 28.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $96,783, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $54,649, a difference of 0.28%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $39,530, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $97,809, a difference of 16.3%).
Income Metric | Burmese | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,005 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $123,369 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $103,145 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $54,559 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $65,236 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,911 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,800 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $113,701 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $121,444 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,139 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Burmese vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 81.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.2%), single female poverty (18.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
Poverty Metric | Burmese | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.9% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.2% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Burmese vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 167.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 76.9%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 72.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Burmese | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.3% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.6% |
Burmese vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Burmese | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.5% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.6% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 77.4% |
Burmese vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 59.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.1%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (49.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Burmese | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.8% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.22 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.9% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.4% | Tragic 42.2% |
Burmese vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Burmese | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 6.2% |
Burmese vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 93.1%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 87.5%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 72.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.27%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.79%).
Education Level Metric | Burmese | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.3% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.9% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.7% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.9% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Burmese vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 114.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 81.6%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.3%).
Disability Metric | Burmese | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.9% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |