Burmese vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Tsimshian

Exceptional
Average
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,452,978 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Tsimshian.
Burmese Integration in Tsimshian Communities

Burmese vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $48,836, a difference of 33.6%), per capita income ($52,005 compared to $40,344, a difference of 28.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $96,783, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $54,649, a difference of 0.28%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $39,530, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $97,809, a difference of 16.3%).
Burmese vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricBurmeseTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
23.9%

Burmese vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 81.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.2%), single female poverty (18.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
Burmese vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseTsimshian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
15.7%

Burmese vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 167.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 76.9%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 72.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
Burmese vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseTsimshian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.6%

Burmese vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Burmese vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
77.4%

Burmese vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 59.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.1%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (49.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Burmese vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseTsimshian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
42.2%

Burmese vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.2%).
Burmese vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Fair
6.2%

Burmese vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 93.1%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 87.5%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 72.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.27%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.79%).
Burmese vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.4%

Burmese vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 114.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 81.6%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.3%).
Burmese vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseTsimshian
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%