Burmese vs Shoshone Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Shoshone
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Shoshone

Exceptional
Fair
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Shoshone Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,589,977 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Shoshone.
Burmese Integration in Shoshone Communities

Burmese vs Shoshone Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $83,588, a difference of 45.3%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $72,660, a difference of 42.0%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $87,872, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $48,720, a difference of 12.5%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $34,677, a difference of 29.5%).
Burmese vs Shoshone Income
Income MetricBurmeseShoshone
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$37,072
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Tragic
$87,872
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Tragic
$72,660
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$40,932
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Tragic
$47,930
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$34,677
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Tragic
$48,720
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Tragic
$82,062
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Tragic
$83,588
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Tragic
$53,681
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Good
25.4%

Burmese vs Shoshone Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 51.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 49.6%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 22.5%).
Burmese vs Shoshone Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseShoshone
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
20.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
18.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
25.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Poor
12.4%

Burmese vs Shoshone Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 103.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 62.4%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.0%).
Burmese vs Shoshone Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseShoshone
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.6%

Burmese vs Shoshone Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
Burmese vs Shoshone Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseShoshone
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
76.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
39.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
82.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
79.3%

Burmese vs Shoshone Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 33.9%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 31.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.0%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.37, a difference of 4.9%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 7.4%).
Burmese vs Shoshone Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseShoshone
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Tragic
43.9%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
35.3%

Burmese vs Shoshone Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 29.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.12%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.7%).
Burmese vs Shoshone Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseShoshone
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Fair
10.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
24.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
8.8%

Burmese vs Shoshone Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 90.5%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 85.7%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 77.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
Burmese vs Shoshone Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseShoshone
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Tragic
83.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
61.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
38.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
29.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
11.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.4%

Burmese vs Shoshone Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 57.0%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 45.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.2%).
Burmese vs Shoshone Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseShoshone
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
27.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
49.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%