Burmese vs Italian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Italian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Italians

Exceptional
Excellent
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,365
SOCIAL INDEX
81.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
74th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Italian Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,583,227 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Italians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Italians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 92.1 Italians.
Burmese Integration in Italian Communities

Burmese vs Italian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $92,475, a difference of 11.5%), householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $63,885, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $110,224, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.35%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $53,426, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $41,505, a difference of 8.2%).
Burmese vs Italian Income
Income MetricBurmeseItalian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Exceptional
$47,574
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Exceptional
$112,372
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Exceptional
$92,475
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Exceptional
$49,915
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Exceptional
$59,551
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Exceptional
$41,505
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Exceptional
$53,426
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Exceptional
$104,215
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Exceptional
$110,224
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Exceptional
$63,885
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
28.1%

Burmese vs Italian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 17.3%), receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), poverty (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and male poverty (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.66%).
Burmese vs Italian Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseItalian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
18.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
14.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
9.9%

Burmese vs Italian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
Burmese vs Italian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseItalian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Burmese vs Italian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.38%).
Burmese vs Italian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseItalian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
40.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.3%

Burmese vs Italian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 16.7%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.24%), family households (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (49.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Burmese vs Italian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseItalian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
49.0%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Good
30.8%

Burmese vs Italian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.34%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Burmese vs Italian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseItalian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
58.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Burmese vs Italian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.4%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.0%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.3% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.45%).
Burmese vs Italian Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseItalian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Exceptional
67.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Excellent
61.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Exceptional
40.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Excellent
2.0%

Burmese vs Italian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Italian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.76%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Burmese vs Italian Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseItalian
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Average
11.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
45.6%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
2.4%