Burmese vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,365,486 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 14.3 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $56,302, a difference of 15.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $98,586, a difference of 15.3%), and median household income ($103,145 compared to $90,618, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $51,259, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $65,854, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 14.8%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.76%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.7%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.2%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.5%), ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.5%).