Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sierra Leonean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Sierra Leoneans

Exceptional
Average
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,851
SOCIAL INDEX
46.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
191st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sierra Leonean Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,684,977 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Sierra Leoneans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Sierra Leoneans.
Burmese Integration in Sierra Leonean Communities

Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 30.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $93,435, a difference of 21.7%), and median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $54,279, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $57,272, a difference of 4.5%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $42,868, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $65,038, a difference of 9.4%).
Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Income
Income MetricBurmeseSierra Leonean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Average
$43,405
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Good
$103,859
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Excellent
$88,463
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Exceptional
$48,286
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Average
$54,279
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Exceptional
$42,868
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Exceptional
$57,272
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Fair
$93,435
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Good
$102,427
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Exceptional
$65,038
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
21.4%

Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 41.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 37.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.72%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseSierra Leonean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
12.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Poor
9.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
17.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
19.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
17.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
12.2%

Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.4%).
Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseSierra Leonean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
19.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
11.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%

Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseSierra Leonean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
68.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Excellent
37.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
84.5%

Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 46.3%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 32.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.30, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (65.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseSierra Leonean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
28.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.30
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
43.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
34.9%

Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.0%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 12.7%).
Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseSierra Leonean
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Poor
89.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
52.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
18.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
5.9%

Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.7%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.37%).
Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseSierra Leonean
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Average
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Average
93.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Average
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Good
86.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Good
66.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Good
60.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Excellent
47.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Exceptional
40.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Excellent
2.0%

Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.3%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Burmese vs Sierra Leonean Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseSierra Leonean
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Good
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%