Burmese vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,821,286 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $86,418, a difference of 19.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $103,536, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $97,237, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $50,379, a difference of 8.8%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $39,891, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), poverty (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 31.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 11.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.67%), married-couple households (49.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 80.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.1%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 33.1%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.8%).