Burmese vs Hopi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hopi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Hopi

Exceptional
Poor
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,478
SOCIAL INDEX
12.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
306th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hopi Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,023,351 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Hopi within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Hopi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Hopi.
Burmese Integration in Hopi Communities

Burmese vs Hopi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,005 compared to $31,177, a difference of 66.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $75,562, a difference of 60.7%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $77,188, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $46,978, a difference of 16.7%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $33,932, a difference of 32.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $50,925, a difference of 39.7%).
Burmese vs Hopi Income
Income MetricBurmeseHopi
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$31,177
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Tragic
$77,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Tragic
$65,043
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$36,871
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Tragic
$42,060
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$33,932
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Tragic
$46,978
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Tragic
$75,002
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Tragic
$75,562
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Tragic
$50,925
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
20.0%

Burmese vs Hopi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 149.2%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 134.6%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 117.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 31.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 49.2%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 53.4%).
Burmese vs Hopi Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseHopi
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
20.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
20.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
21.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
28.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
23.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
27.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
27.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
25.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
27.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
27.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
28.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
17.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
18.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
21.6%

Burmese vs Hopi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 158.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 131.9%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 119.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.1%).
Burmese vs Hopi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseHopi
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.1%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
30.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
19.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
16.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.4%

Burmese vs Hopi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 71.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 10.1%).
Burmese vs Hopi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseHopi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
58.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
71.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
31.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Tragic
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
75.0%

Burmese vs Hopi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 92.8%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.76%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.60, a difference of 11.8%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 12.9%).
Burmese vs Hopi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseHopi
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
25.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Tragic
36.7%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.60
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
36.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
50.8%

Burmese vs Hopi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 41.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.82%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.7%).
Burmese vs Hopi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseHopi
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
13.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
86.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
49.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.9%

Burmese vs Hopi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (46.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 85.3%), master's degree (19.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 81.2%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
Burmese vs Hopi Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseHopi
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Good
97.5%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
91.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
88.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
57.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
50.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
34.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
25.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
10.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.6%

Burmese vs Hopi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 312.3%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.4%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 15.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.8%).
Burmese vs Hopi Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseHopi
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
4.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
30.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
52.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%