Burmese vs Croatian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Croatian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Croatians

Exceptional
Excellent
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,930
SOCIAL INDEX
86.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
37th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Croatian Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 345,254,020 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Croatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Croatians.
Burmese Integration in Croatian Communities

Burmese vs Croatian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $90,685, a difference of 13.7%), householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $63,225, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $108,383, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $51,662, a difference of 6.1%), and per capita income ($52,005 compared to $47,742, a difference of 8.9%).
Burmese vs Croatian Income
Income MetricBurmeseCroatian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Exceptional
$47,742
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Exceptional
$111,370
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Exceptional
$90,685
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Exceptional
$49,724
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Exceptional
$59,715
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Exceptional
$40,993
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Fair
$51,662
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Exceptional
$102,414
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Exceptional
$108,383
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Exceptional
$63,225
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
29.0%

Burmese vs Croatian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 16.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and female poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Burmese vs Croatian Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseCroatian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
15.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
14.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
19.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
9.6%

Burmese vs Croatian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.34%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Burmese vs Croatian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseCroatian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Good
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Burmese vs Croatian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.41%).
Burmese vs Croatian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseCroatian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
41.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.6%

Burmese vs Croatian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 14.5%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.090%), married-couple households (49.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (65.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Burmese vs Croatian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseCroatian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Excellent
30.2%

Burmese vs Croatian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 17.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.36%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Burmese vs Croatian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseCroatian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Good
6.5%

Burmese vs Croatian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.6%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.2%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.54%).
Burmese vs Croatian Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseCroatian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Exceptional
88.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Exceptional
49.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Exceptional
40.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%

Burmese vs Croatian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.48%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.3%).
Burmese vs Croatian Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseCroatian
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%