Burmese vs Dominican Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Dominican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Dominicans

Exceptional
Tragic
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
590
SOCIAL INDEX
3.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
342nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Dominican Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,885,784 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Dominicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 33.7 Dominicans.
Burmese Integration in Dominican Communities

Burmese vs Dominican Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $46,964, a difference of 51.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $80,623, a difference of 50.6%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $82,888, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $49,633, a difference of 10.4%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $37,046, a difference of 21.2%), and median earnings ($54,559 compared to $41,864, a difference of 30.3%).
Burmese vs Dominican Income
Income MetricBurmeseDominican
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$37,697
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Tragic
$82,888
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Tragic
$71,302
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$41,864
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Tragic
$47,204
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$37,046
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Tragic
$49,633
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Tragic
$81,229
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Tragic
$80,623
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Tragic
$46,964
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
20.6%

Burmese vs Dominican Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 147.0%), family poverty (7.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 95.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 92.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 17.7%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 29.8%).
Burmese vs Dominican Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseDominican
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
19.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
22.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
24.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
23.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
24.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
23.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
19.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
17.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
21.4%

Burmese vs Dominican Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 54.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 50.8%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.0%).
Burmese vs Dominican Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseDominican
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
23.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.5%

Burmese vs Dominican Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Burmese vs Dominican Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseDominican
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
31.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
80.3%

Burmese vs Dominican Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 73.6%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 51.1%), and married-couple households (49.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.6%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.8%).
Burmese vs Dominican Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseDominican
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Tragic
38.2%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
39.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
39.8%

Burmese vs Dominican Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 204.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 94.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 84.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 70.7%, a difference of 27.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 63.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 84.0%).
Burmese vs Dominican Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseDominican
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
29.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
70.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
35.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
11.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
3.5%

Burmese vs Dominican Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 94.7%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 73.3%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Burmese vs Dominican Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseDominican
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
96.8%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
96.7%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
96.6%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
96.4%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
95.5%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
94.9%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
93.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
92.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
91.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
89.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
87.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
85.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
82.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Tragic
79.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
55.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
50.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
39.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
31.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.4%

Burmese vs Dominican Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 39.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 9.2%).
Burmese vs Dominican Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseDominican
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
26.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%