Burmese vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cape Verdean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Cape Verdeans

Exceptional
Poor
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,263
SOCIAL INDEX
10.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
317th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cape Verdean Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,180,811 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.367. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 10.4 Cape Verdeans.
Burmese Integration in Cape Verdean Communities

Burmese vs Cape Verdean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $50,077, a difference of 42.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $87,580, a difference of 38.7%), and median household income ($103,145 compared to $75,848, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $51,387, a difference of 6.6%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $38,614, a difference of 16.3%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 18.8%).
Burmese vs Cape Verdean Income
Income MetricBurmeseCape Verdean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$39,935
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Tragic
$91,848
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Tragic
$75,848
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$44,640
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Tragic
$51,103
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$38,614
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Poor
$51,387
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Tragic
$85,758
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Tragic
$87,580
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Tragic
$50,077
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
23.6%

Burmese vs Cape Verdean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 143.6%), family poverty (7.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 49.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.8%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 17.5%).
Burmese vs Cape Verdean Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseCape Verdean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
18.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
16.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
21.1%

Burmese vs Cape Verdean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 51.9%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 45.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.9%).
Burmese vs Cape Verdean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseCape Verdean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
11.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%

Burmese vs Cape Verdean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 29.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.56%).
Burmese vs Cape Verdean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseCape Verdean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
44.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
78.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
82.1%

Burmese vs Cape Verdean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 67.4%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 56.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households (65.7% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 6.4%).
Burmese vs Cape Verdean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseCape Verdean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
61.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Tragic
38.1%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
39.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
41.3%

Burmese vs Cape Verdean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 60.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 55.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 37.7%).
Burmese vs Cape Verdean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseCape Verdean
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
84.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
46.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
15.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
4.4%

Burmese vs Cape Verdean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 82.8%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 82.3%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Burmese vs Cape Verdean Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseCape Verdean
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
95.5%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
95.1%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
94.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
90.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
87.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Tragic
80.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
56.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
50.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
38.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.4%

Burmese vs Cape Verdean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 53.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 9.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 15.3%).
Burmese vs Cape Verdean Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseCape Verdean
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
50.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
19.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.0%