Burmese vs Menominee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Menominee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Menominee

Exceptional
Fair
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,175
SOCIAL INDEX
29.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
229th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Menominee Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,204,868 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 6.2 Menominee.
Burmese Integration in Menominee Communities

Burmese vs Menominee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $76,903, a difference of 57.9%), median family income ($123,369 compared to $79,563, a difference of 55.1%), and median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $42,581, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $47,907, a difference of 14.4%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 23.3%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $33,894, a difference of 32.5%).
Burmese vs Menominee Income
Income MetricBurmeseMenominee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$34,578
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Tragic
$79,563
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Tragic
$68,423
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$37,884
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Tragic
$42,581
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$33,894
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Tragic
$47,907
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Tragic
$79,358
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Tragic
$76,903
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Tragic
$51,719
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
22.7%

Burmese vs Menominee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 98.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 92.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 79.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.7%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.3%).
Burmese vs Menominee Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseMenominee
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
16.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
23.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
23.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
25.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
27.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
37.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
17.2%

Burmese vs Menominee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 132.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 82.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.8%).
Burmese vs Menominee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseMenominee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
11.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.6%

Burmese vs Menominee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Burmese vs Menominee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseMenominee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
60.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
33.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Tragic
68.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
82.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
77.4%

Burmese vs Menominee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 107.3%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 93.9%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 73.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.30, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.1%).
Burmese vs Menominee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseMenominee
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Tragic
42.0%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.30
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
42.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
51.1%

Burmese vs Menominee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 37.2%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 20.2%).
Burmese vs Menominee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseMenominee
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
17.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
5.0%

Burmese vs Menominee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 98.1%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 94.6%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 93.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
Burmese vs Menominee Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseMenominee
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
91.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
57.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
50.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
36.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
27.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.4%

Burmese vs Menominee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 104.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 72.5%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 13.9%).
Burmese vs Menominee Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseMenominee
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
15.0%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
15.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
27.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
52.3%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%