Burmese vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,112,886 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $96,086, a difference of 26.4%), median family income ($123,369 compared to $98,205, a difference of 25.6%), and median household income ($103,145 compared to $82,560, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $52,302, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $38,945, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 44.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 33.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.38%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.55%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 28.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.40%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.1%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 56.4%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.7%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%).