Malaysian vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,492,663 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 37.7 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,194 compared to $34,974, a difference of 12.1%), median family income ($95,230 compared to $85,050, a difference of 12.0%), and median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $45,538, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $51,022, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $53,420, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 27.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.4%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 10.5%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (65.9% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 30.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.7%), and master's degree (12.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.88%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.59%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 3.1%).