Taiwanese vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,696,189 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.170. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 2.014% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to a decrease of 2,013.6 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,455 compared to $34,974, a difference of 32.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $80,012, a difference of 26.9%), and median family income ($107,295 compared to $85,050, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $51,022, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,894 compared to $53,420, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 55.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 51.6%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.2%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 46.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 45.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 39.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 36.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.59%), currently married (45.8% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 30.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 74.2%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 73.5%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.88%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.8%).