Panamanian vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 277,795,401 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Panamanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Panamanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.532% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Panamanians corresponds to an increase of 532.4 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,035 compared to $34,974, a difference of 20.2%), median male earnings ($52,835 compared to $45,538, a difference of 16.0%), and median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $33,953, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,611 compared to $51,022, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,266 compared to $53,420, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.5%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.3%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.0%), currently married (45.3% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 40.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 40.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 71.7%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.3%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 9.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.8%).