Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,421,734 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to a decrease of 29.6 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,516 compared to $34,974, a difference of 24.4%), median family income ($101,092 compared to $85,050, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,922 compared to $53,420, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($55,914 compared to $51,022, a difference of 9.6%), and median household income ($83,968 compared to $74,217, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 69.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 63.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 128.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 33.7%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 40.2%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (46.7% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 23.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 148.9%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 43.6%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.4%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 64.1%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and male disability (13.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.9%).