Portuguese vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 435,346,231 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,362 compared to $34,974, a difference of 26.8%), median family income ($106,286 compared to $85,050, a difference of 25.0%), and median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $45,538, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $51,022, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $53,420, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 61.4%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 44.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 26.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.77%), family households (65.8% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 14.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 71.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 47.6%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.7%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.3%).