Jamaican vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,611,018 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Jamaican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.491. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jamaicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.129% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jamaicans corresponds to a decrease of 128.8 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 25.8%), median female earnings ($38,670 compared to $33,953, a difference of 13.9%), and per capita income ($39,231 compared to $34,974, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,929 compared to $51,022, a difference of 0.18%), householder income over 65 years ($54,560 compared to $53,420, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,327 compared to $85,965, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.3%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.2% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.7%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.4%), births to unmarried women (38.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.31 compared to 3.49, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 100.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 83.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 11.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 28.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 54.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 50.4%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 34.4%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 11.0%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.64%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%).