Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,562,747 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.311% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 311.4 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $80,012, a difference of 22.2%), median family income ($101,543 compared to $85,050, a difference of 19.4%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $33,953, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $51,022, a difference of 7.1%), and median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,538, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 86.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 50.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 123.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 68.4%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.0%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 1.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 37.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 22.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.31%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 118.1%), college, 1 year or more (57.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.5%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 96.4%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 59.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.4%).