Mexican vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,931,257 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Mexican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.950. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexicans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.320% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexicans corresponds to an increase of 319.5 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($49,989 compared to $51,022, a difference of 2.1%), and median male earnings ($46,147 compared to $45,538, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($39,834 compared to $39,762, a difference of 0.18%), median household income ($74,399 compared to $74,217, a difference of 0.24%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,427 compared to $80,012, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.6% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 0.040%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (47.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.3%), currently married (45.2% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.48 compared to 3.49, a difference of 0.51%), single father households (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 27.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 9.7%), professional degree (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and master's degree (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (35.0% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (96.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (96.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 8.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.52%), disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.6%).