French Canadian vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,540,793 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.380. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 7.9 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.8%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $64,920, a difference of 12.0%), and per capita income ($43,003 compared to $39,403, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $98,778, a difference of 0.32%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $53,078, a difference of 0.77%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $84,729, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 23.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.5%), average family size (3.07 compared to 3.41, a difference of 10.9%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.62%), currently married (48.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 35.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 17.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.29%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.9%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 54.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.47%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.9%).