Immigrants from Scotland vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,147,727 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 70.9 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,893 compared to $39,403, a difference of 26.6%), median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $50,488, a difference of 21.3%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $43,673, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $53,078, a difference of 0.84%), householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $64,920, a difference of 2.6%), and median household income ($94,091 compared to $84,729, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 43.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.9%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.41%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.2%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.1%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.57%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (64.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 34.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.31%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 52.5%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 50.0%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 17.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.98%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 3.7%).