Celtic vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Hawaiians

Average
Fair
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hawaiian Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,876,868 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to a decrease of 26.3 Hawaiians.
Celtic Integration in Hawaiian Communities

Celtic vs Hawaiian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $39,403, a difference of 10.7%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and median male earnings ($54,242 compared to $50,488, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $98,778, a difference of 0.12%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $90,722, a difference of 1.7%), and median household income ($83,193 compared to $84,729, a difference of 1.8%).
Celtic vs Hawaiian Income
Income MetricCelticHawaiian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Tragic
$39,403
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Poor
$98,869
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Average
$84,729
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Tragic
$43,673
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Tragic
$50,488
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Tragic
$37,497
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Excellent
$53,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Poor
$90,722
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Fair
$98,778
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Exceptional
$64,920
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Excellent
24.9%

Celtic vs Hawaiian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 22.6%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 18.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.010%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.81%).
Celtic vs Hawaiian Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticHawaiian
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Good
8.8%
Average
9.0%
Males
Average
11.2%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Average
13.4%
Fair
13.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.9%

Celtic vs Hawaiian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Celtic vs Hawaiian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticHawaiian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Fair
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Average
5.5%

Celtic vs Hawaiian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
Celtic vs Hawaiian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticHawaiian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
81.5%

Celtic vs Hawaiian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.2%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.41, a difference of 9.5%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 0.25%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Celtic vs Hawaiian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticHawaiian
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Poor
33.2%

Celtic vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.060%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Celtic vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticHawaiian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
92.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
60.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
24.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.9%

Celtic vs Hawaiian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.9%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%).
Celtic vs Hawaiian Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticHawaiian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
62.1%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
40.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Celtic vs Hawaiian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 37.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
Celtic vs Hawaiian Disability
Disability MetricCelticHawaiian
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%