Tsimshian vs Hawaiian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Hawaiian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Hawaiians
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hawaiian Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,053,456 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 9.1 Hawaiians.
Tsimshian vs Hawaiian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $64,920, a difference of 11.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $90,722, a difference of 7.8%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $37,497, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($43,695 compared to $43,673, a difference of 0.050%), median household income ($83,346 compared to $84,729, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,783 compared to $98,778, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Hawaiian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Tragic $39,403 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Poor $98,869 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Average $84,729 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Tragic $43,673 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Tragic $50,488 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Tragic $37,497 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Excellent $53,078 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Poor $90,722 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Fair $98,778 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Exceptional $64,920 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Excellent 24.9% |
Tsimshian vs Hawaiian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 44.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 44.6%), and receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.56%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and female poverty (13.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Hawaiian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Fair 12.5% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Average 9.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Fair 11.4% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Fair 13.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Poor 14.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Average 17.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Fair 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Fair 21.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Average 29.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Tsimshian vs Hawaiian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 134.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 73.4%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Hawaiian |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Fair 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Average 5.5% |
Tsimshian vs Hawaiian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Hawaiian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Exceptional 38.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Exceptional 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 81.5% |
Tsimshian vs Hawaiian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 26.9%), divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 0.49%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Hawaiian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 67.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.41 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Poor 33.2% |
Tsimshian vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 45.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 27.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Hawaiian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 92.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 60.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 24.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 8.9% |
Tsimshian vs Hawaiian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.4%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Hawaiian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Fair 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 96.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Poor 90.8% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Poor 85.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Tragic 62.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Tragic 55.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 40.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 31.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Tsimshian vs Hawaiian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 97.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 43.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.99%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.0%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Hawaiian |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 25.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |