Russian vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,425,060 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 39.3 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $39,403, a difference of 34.9%), median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $50,488, a difference of 26.6%), and median earnings ($53,334 compared to $43,673, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $53,078, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $64,920, a difference of 4.2%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 34.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.71%), currently married (48.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 49.5%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 44.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 83.9%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.5%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 21.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.2%).