Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,444,746 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,316 compared to $35,999, a difference of 37.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,662 compared to $78,168, a difference of 33.9%), and median household income ($93,051 compared to $69,947, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $53,060, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $45,450, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 55.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.56%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 38.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.3%), births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 33.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 72.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.4%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 59.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 8th grade (96.0% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 62.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 62.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.2%).