Thai vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,857,267 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($110,648 compared to $69,947, a difference of 58.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($129,560 compared to $82,287, a difference of 57.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($121,778 compared to $78,168, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (30.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.3%), householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $45,450, a difference of 30.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,099 compared to $53,060, a difference of 35.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 90.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 82.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 81.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.3%), and single father poverty (14.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 42.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 54.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 53.5%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 41.1%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.21%), family households (67.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (30.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.40%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (21.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 96.9%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 91.2%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 90.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 91.3%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 89.4%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 78.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and self-care disability (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.3%).