Hawaiian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,593,280 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $53,060, a difference of 22.4%), median household income ($84,729 compared to $69,947, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $82,287, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $47,729, a difference of 5.8%), median earnings ($43,673 compared to $40,270, a difference of 8.5%), and per capita income ($39,403 compared to $35,999, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 37.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 35.1%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 5.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 17.2%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.77%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.22%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.2%), associate's degree (40.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 53.8%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 44.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.0%).