Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,829,023 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.845. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.020% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 1,019.9 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $35,999, a difference of 43.8%), median family income ($116,165 compared to $84,835, a difference of 36.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $78,168, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $45,450, a difference of 19.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $53,060, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 59.0%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 51.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 39.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 33.5%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.3%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 80.3%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 68.2%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 64.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 63.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 13.7%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 28.3%).