Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,357,041 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Dominican Republic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Dominican Republic within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Dominican Republic corresponds to an increase of 5.0 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 36.8%), householder income over 65 years ($45,758 compared to $53,060, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,204 compared to $45,450, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,208 compared to $69,947, a difference of 0.37%), median male earnings ($46,655 compared to $47,729, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,319 compared to $78,168, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 62.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 60.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (20.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 60.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (24.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 36.6%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 35.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.2% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.9%), married-couple households (37.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and currently married (38.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (31.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 298.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 138.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 120.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (68.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 34.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (33.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 78.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 120.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 87.5%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and college, under 1 year (54.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 85.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.69%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (50.3% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 4.8%).