Tlingit-Haida vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,359,526 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.550. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to an increase of 7.1 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,914 compared to $45,450, a difference of 23.0%), per capita income ($43,516 compared to $35,999, a difference of 20.9%), and median household income ($83,968 compared to $69,947, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,409 compared to $47,729, a difference of 9.8%), median earnings ($45,468 compared to $40,270, a difference of 12.9%), and median female earnings ($39,513 compared to $33,775, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 47.3%), single male poverty (11.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 46.4%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 10.2%), receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 135.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 40.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.6%), births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.86%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.8%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.45%), 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 4.1%), hearing disability (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.0%).