Native/Alaskan vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,897,306 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 14.2 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 14.5%), per capita income ($33,279 compared to $35,999, a difference of 8.2%), and median male earnings ($44,775 compared to $47,729, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $33,775, a difference of 0.090%), householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $53,060, a difference of 1.9%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $69,947, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.1%), receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 26.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 0.58%), single female poverty (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 37.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.1%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 16.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.9%), bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 11.0%), ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.6%).