Immigrants from Mexico vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 262,825,237 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 11.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $45,450, a difference of 10.9%), and median male earnings ($44,960 compared to $47,729, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $53,060, a difference of 0.49%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,809 compared to $78,168, a difference of 0.82%), and median family income ($83,639 compared to $84,835, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 29.5%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.66%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 17.3%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and family households with children (31.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.1%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.35%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 101.1%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.8%), and professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 50.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 49.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 3.1%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.4%).