Icelander vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,865,270 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.406% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 406.2 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,987 compared to $35,999, a difference of 25.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $82,287, a difference of 24.3%), and median family income ($104,282 compared to $84,835, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $45,450, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $53,060, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 43.7%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 42.6%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 42.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 21.7%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.92%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 48.2%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 41.9%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 55.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 53.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.7%).