Comanche vs Choctaw In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Comanche
 Choctaw
 In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Comanche
Choctaw
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Choctaw In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,769,144 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119 and weighted average of 81.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,623,280 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 81.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Choctaw | 
| Minimum | 33.3% | 48.6% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 66.7% | 51.4% | 
| Mean | 77.6% | 77.3% | 
| Median | 80.3% | 77.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 70.2% | 69.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 87.4% | 82.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 12.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 12.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 12.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Choctaw by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Chickasaw (81.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Seminole (81.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Colville (81.6%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Dutch West Indian (81.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Ute (80.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Houma (81.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Creek (80.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 82.2% | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 82.2% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 82.1% | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 82.0% | 
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.7% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.6% | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.6% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.6% | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.6% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.1% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 81.0% | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.8% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.7% | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.6% | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.4% | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 80.3% | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |