Swedish vs Choctaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Swedes

Choctaw

Excellent
Fair
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Choctaw Integration in Swedish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,763,086 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.655. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.166% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 166.5 Choctaw.
Swedish Integration in Choctaw Communities

Swedish vs Choctaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,377 compared to $82,287, a difference of 29.3%), median family income ($108,499 compared to $84,835, a difference of 27.9%), and per capita income ($45,750 compared to $35,999, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $45,450, a difference of 16.6%), and median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $33,775, a difference of 16.7%).
Swedish vs Choctaw Income
Income MetricSwedishChoctaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,750
Tragic
$35,999
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,499
Tragic
$84,835
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,524
Tragic
$69,947
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,851
Tragic
$40,270
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,445
Tragic
$47,729
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,421
Tragic
$33,775
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,986
Tragic
$45,450
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,136
Tragic
$78,168
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,377
Tragic
$82,287
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,736
Tragic
$53,060
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
28.1%

Swedish vs Choctaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 63.2%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 63.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 20.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 27.2%).
Swedish vs Choctaw Poverty
Poverty MetricSwedishChoctaw
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Tragic
24.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
18.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.4%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
13.6%

Swedish vs Choctaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.3%).
Swedish vs Choctaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSwedishChoctaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.9%

Swedish vs Choctaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.6%).
Swedish vs Choctaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSwedishChoctaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
61.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.1%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.8%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
78.2%

Swedish vs Choctaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.2%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 24.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.60%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.7%).
Swedish vs Choctaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSwedishChoctaw
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.7%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Tragic
36.9%

Swedish vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.070%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Swedish vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSwedishChoctaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.8%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.8%

Swedish vs Choctaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.7%), master's degree (15.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 38.2%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Swedish vs Choctaw Education Level
Education Level MetricSwedishChoctaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
89.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.8%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
52.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
37.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.1%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Good
15.2%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.4%

Swedish vs Choctaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.6%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.6%).
Swedish vs Choctaw Disability
Disability MetricSwedishChoctaw
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
15.4%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
16.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
52.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.0%