Immigrants from Malaysia vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,672,220 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.506% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 505.9 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $35,999, a difference of 38.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $78,168, a difference of 37.7%), and median household income ($96,292 compared to $69,947, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $45,450, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $53,060, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 50.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 45.7%), and single male poverty (12.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 53.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 34.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.7%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.22%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and family households (64.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 72.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 77.3%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 76.9%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 71.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 71.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 70.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 31.9%).