Kiowa vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,290,278 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 16.3 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 19.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $82,287, a difference of 10.0%), and median household income ($65,914 compared to $69,947, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $33,775, a difference of 0.89%), householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $45,450, a difference of 1.6%), and per capita income ($35,102 compared to $35,999, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 20.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), single female poverty (26.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 17.0%), married-couple households (42.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.8%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 46.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.9%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.090%), 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (32.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), disability (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.4%).