Turkish vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,358,360 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 30.2 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $35,999, a difference of 45.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $82,287, a difference of 43.2%), and median family income ($121,202 compared to $84,835, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $45,450, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $53,060, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 61.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 58.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 39.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.3%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 34.4%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 48.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 92.2%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 84.4%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 80.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 72.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 70.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 34.8%).