Immigrants from Oceania vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,427,218 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.530% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 530.1 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,100 compared to $69,947, a difference of 27.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $82,287, a difference of 26.0%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $35,999, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 9.7%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $47,729, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $45,450, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 39.0%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 36.9%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 20.6%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 41.5%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 51.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.3%).