Luxembourger vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,492,616 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.120% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 120.2 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $35,999, a difference of 26.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $82,287, a difference of 25.8%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $84,835, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $45,450, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $53,060, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 62.3%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 61.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 47.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.7%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 25.3%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.5%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.34%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.0%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 39.2%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 70.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 55.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.6%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 30.7%).