Barbadian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,767,966 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.181% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to an increase of 180.9 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 48.4%), median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $33,775, a difference of 22.2%), and per capita income ($42,406 compared to $35,999, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,163 compared to $53,060, a difference of 2.1%), median male earnings ($51,236 compared to $47,729, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $82,287, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 27.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.4%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.16%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.7%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 17.0%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 0.23%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (62.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 230.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 99.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 82.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 24.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 54.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 82.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.3%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.2%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.33%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 80.8%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 80.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.68%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.1%).