Lumbee vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,600,212 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 7.7 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 31.9%), householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $45,450, a difference of 31.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($40,550 compared to $53,060, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $33,775, a difference of 3.9%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $40,270, a difference of 9.2%), and median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $47,729, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 68.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 59.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 18.8%), single female poverty (33.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 52.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 50.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 30.7%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and currently married (39.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (63.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 31.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.65%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 32.7%), professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.1%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.070%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.84%), male disability (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.0%).