Scandinavian vs Choctaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scandinavians

Choctaw

Good
Fair
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Choctaw Integration in Scandinavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,719,834 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.840. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.896% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 895.9 Choctaw.
Scandinavian Integration in Choctaw Communities

Scandinavian vs Choctaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $82,287, a difference of 25.1%), median family income ($104,410 compared to $84,835, a difference of 23.1%), and median household income ($86,073 compared to $69,947, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $33,775, a difference of 13.4%), and median earnings ($46,433 compared to $40,270, a difference of 15.3%).
Scandinavian vs Choctaw Income
Income MetricScandinavianChoctaw
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,848
Tragic
$35,999
Median Family Income
Good
$104,410
Tragic
$84,835
Median Household Income
Good
$86,073
Tragic
$69,947
Median Earnings
Average
$46,433
Tragic
$40,270
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,527
Tragic
$47,729
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,306
Tragic
$33,775
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,654
Tragic
$45,450
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,596
Tragic
$78,168
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,969
Tragic
$82,287
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,586
Tragic
$53,060
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.1%
Tragic
28.1%

Scandinavian vs Choctaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 52.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 51.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 19.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 20.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.6%).
Scandinavian vs Choctaw Poverty
Poverty MetricScandinavianChoctaw
Poverty
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
16.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.3%
Tragic
24.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Tragic
27.2%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.6%

Scandinavian vs Choctaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Scandinavian vs Choctaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScandinavianChoctaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%

Scandinavian vs Choctaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.9%).
Scandinavian vs Choctaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScandinavianChoctaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
61.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
78.2%

Scandinavian vs Choctaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 23.9%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.26%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.4%).
Scandinavian vs Choctaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScandinavianChoctaw
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
36.9%

Scandinavian vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.94%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Scandinavian vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScandinavianChoctaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.8%

Scandinavian vs Choctaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.2%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 30.1%), and bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
Scandinavian vs Choctaw Education Level
Education Level MetricScandinavianChoctaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
89.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Tragic
52.3%
Associate's Degree
Good
46.9%
Tragic
37.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%

Scandinavian vs Choctaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 52.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 38.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.7%).
Scandinavian vs Choctaw Disability
Disability MetricScandinavianChoctaw
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
15.4%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
16.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
52.7%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%